How to balance leadership styles for project Success

Spread the love

Project management requires more than just following protocols and meeting deadlines; it demands effective leadership that adapts to the shifting dynamics of the project and the team. Understanding and balancing various leadership styles, while applying the Pareto Principle, can significantly enhance project outcomes. This principle, which posits that affects come from causes, can streamline project management processes, making them more efficient and impactful.

Identifying Leadership Styles

Leadership styles vary widely but knowing when and how to apply them can be the difference between project success and failure. The most commonly identified styles include:

Authoritative Quick, clear decision making, ideal for crises.

Democratic Involves the team in decision making, perfect for encouraging commitment and generating ideas.

Laissez faire Minimal supervision, works best with a highly motivated or skilled team.

Transformational Focuses on initiating change in organisations, inspires and motivates teams to innovate.

Transactional Routine, structured style with clear rewards for specific tasks.

Each style has its strengths and is suitable for different phases of a project, from inception to completion.

The Pareto Principle and Leadership

The Pareto Principle or the rule applies profoundly to leadership in design operation. By fastening on the leadership sweats that count the most, directors can ensure they achieve the design’s objects. This approach not only optimises coffers but also maximises platoon affair with minimum trouble, which is pivotal in maintaining platoon morale and design pace

Balancing Leadership Styles for Project Initiation

During the project initiation phase, the authoritative style is often most effective. Setting a clear vision and path for the project is crucial, and decisive leadership helps to establish early milestones and team roles. However, integrating the Pareto Principle means these decisive acts though few will lay the groundwork for the majority of the project’s progress, making early strategic decisions critical.

Democratic Style in Planning

As the project moves into the planning phase, a democratic style becomes more beneficial. Engaging the team in the planning process ensures that diverse ideas are considered and that everyone commits to the project plan. Here, the Pareto Principle suggests that key participatory planning sessions can shape much of the project’s trajectory. Facilitating crucial brainstorming workshops or critical path discussions will leverage team expertise effectively, driving 80% of the planning success.

Execution Phase: Combining Styles

The execution phase often requires a blend of transformational and transactional leadership. Transformational leaders will continuously inspire and motivate their teams, which is crucial for navigating challenges and sparking innovation in problem-solving. Simultaneously, transactional leadership helps maintain day-to-day progress through structured tasks and rewards. Applying the Pareto Principle, focusing on pivotal motivational speeches or critical feedback at this stage can catalyse significant project milestones and maintain momentum.

Laissez-faire and Project Closure

As the project nears completion, shifting to a laissez-faire style can be effective, especially when tasks become routine or when teams need to resolve final issues independently. Here, minimal but strategic involvement focusing on tasks such as final approvals or critical reviews can ensure that the closure activities are completed efficiently.

Adapting with Situational Leadership

Situational leadership is essential, as it allows a leader to adapt their style based on the team’s needs and the project phase. This flexibility ensures that leadership efforts are not just about balancing styles in isolation but about integrating them in a contextually relevant manner. Leaders who master this adaptability can apply their efforts succinctly according to the Pareto Principle, optimising both team performance and project outcomes.

Case Study: Software Development Project

Consider a software development project where the project manager utilised a balanced approach to leadership styles, integrated with the Pareto Principle. In the initiation phase, an authoritative style defined the project’s scope and deadlines. During development, a democratic style facilitated innovative solutions and robust architecture decisions, while transformational leadership kept the team motivated and creatively engaged. Finally, transactional leadership ensured timely completions during the rollout phase. The strategic use of these styles at key project stages led to the successful on-time delivery of the software.


Balancing Colourful leadership styles effectively throughout the different phases of a design ensures not only the success of the design but also enhances platoon satisfaction and cooperation. By applying the Pareto Principle, leaders can concentrate their efforts on the pivotal that delivers the results, therefore optimising both processes and issues. Design leaders are encouraged to continually assess and acclimatise their leadership strategies to meet the specific requirements of their design, icing a dynamic and responsive operation style that’s both effective and effective.

Project success, thus, doesn’t solely depend on the leader’s knowledge of design operation principles but significantly on their capability to strategically balance leadership styles according to the demands of the design and the dynamics of the team. By effectively integrating various leadership approaches, leaders can enhance team collaboration, drive innovation, and ensure meticulous execution, ultimately leading to the successful realisation of project goals.

Spread the love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *